Phone: (03) 9563 4688

Email: office@aubreypaton.com.au

Address: 17D Chester Street, Oakleigh VIC 3166

Latest Accounting News
Hot Issues
Access to more resources and tools than most websites.
Tax Return Mistakes
SMSF advice appetite strong, says ASIC
Taxpayers confused by Scott Morrison’s $1,080 tax refund
Common STP set-up mistakes - ATO
Proposal to hold directors liable for GST set to pierce corporate veil
September 2019 - vital statistics for Australia
Tax Commissioner wants to turn black economy to ‘lighter shade of grey’
Changes to the Private Health Insurance Statement
Up to 9 in 10 ‘other’ expenses adjusted as ATO reveals dodgy claims
Downsizer Super Contribution
Tax payers to receive beefed up tax returns.
10 top global corporations since 1998
Catch-up Contributions
Life Insurance
Community tip-offs trigger ATO visits
Australia at a glance
2019: Tax Time Checklists - Individuals; Company; Trust; Partnership; and Super Funds
Small business clients need to be ready for STP by 30 September
Big four firm outlines new financial year checklist for SMSFs
Alert - Online Share Accommodation
ATO flashes warning over $7.2bn car expenses claims
Vital statistics for our great nation.
3 out of 4 tax dob-ins are about business
Tax on compensation received for inappropriate advice
‘Extra care’ crucial in avoiding ATO spotlight this tax time
ATO clears up FAQs about Single Touch Payroll
GST reporting: common errors and how to correct them
LRBAs, guarantees in need of review after property market falls
Articles archive
Quarter 2 April - June 2019
Quarter 1 January - March 2019
Quarter 4 October - December 2018
Quarter 3 July - September 2018
Quarter 2 April - June 2018
Quarter 1 January - March 2018
Quarter 4 October - December 2017
Quarter 3 July - September 2017
Quarter 2 April - June 2017
Quarter 1 January - March 2017
Quarter 4 October - December 2016
Quarter 3 July - September 2016
Quarter 2 April - June 2016
Quarter 1 January - March 2016
Quarter 4 October - December 2015
Quarter 3 July - September 2015
Quarter 2 April - June 2015
Quarter 1 January - March 2015
Quarter 4 October - December 2014
Quarter 3 July - September 2014
Quarter 2 April - June 2014
Quarter 1 January - March 2014
Quarter 4 October - December 2013
Quarter 3 July - September 2013
Quarter 2 April - June 2013
Quarter 1 January - March 2013
Quarter 4 October - December 2012
Quarter 3 July - September 2012
Quarter 2 April - June 2012
Quarter 1 January - March 2012
Quarter 4 October - December 2011
Quarter 3 July - September 2011
Quarter 2 April - June 2011
Quarter 1 January - March 2011
Quarter 4 October - December 2010
Quarter 3 July - September 2010
Quarter 2 April - June 2010
Quarter 1 January - March 2010
Quarter 4 October - December 2009
Quarter 3 July - September 2009
Quarter 2 April - June 2009
Quarter 1 January - March 2009
Quarter 4 October - December 2008
Quarter 3 July - September 2008
Quarter 2 April - June 2008
Quarter 1 January - March 2008
Quarter 4 October - December 2007
Quarter 2 April - June 2007
Quarter 1 January - March 2007
Quarter 2 April - June 2006
Quarter 1 January - March 2006
Quarter 4 October - December 2005
Quarter 3 July - September 2005
Work Related Deductions – Personal Care Services
Has the scope range of deductions expanded for work related claims?

A recent case concerned whether expenditure incurred by a tax payer with a disability was entitled to a deduction for employing an assistant to assist her in conducting her employment activities.  The tax payer was engaged as a law clerk and had physical disabilities that prevented her from typing and handling files etc.

A personal care worker was engaged to attend to some of the work functions, such as typing, photocopying, handling files and moving items on the desk, but also providing some personal care assistance.

In the words of the judgement "the administrative assistant is basically performing the role that legs, hands and fingers play for able bodies (sic) legal clerks and lawyers".

The tribunal considered that seven-eights of expenses were fully deductible after a private ruling application was in the negative.  The one-eight was attributed to personal hygiene and care.

The view was that the non-personal services provide by the attendant involved outgoings incurred to enable the tax payer to undertake her employment activities and accordingly deductible under the normal deduction provisions.  The expenses included wages, superannuation, advertising, insurance and training of the assistant.

The Commissioner has indicated that he accepts the tribunal's decision.

The tribunal also indicated that despite expenses being claimed under the general deductions, they may also be claimed under the medical rebate provisions.

The decision is not one that is considered to permit employees to claim deductions for delegating their work, merely the principle is reaffirmed that deductions need to be incurred for the purpose of generating assessable income.

 

 



18th-September-2008