Phone: (03) 9563 4688

Email: office@aubreypaton.com.au

Address: 17D Chester Street, Oakleigh VIC 3166

find:
Hot Issues
Federal Budget 2018 - Overview
Your Budget
4 components of our 2018 Federal Budget
Resources to help understand and implement Single Touch Payroll (STP)
New rules capture SMSFs trading big with cryptocurrency
New passive income test for lower corporate tax rate
Tools to help you manage your financial position are available on our site.
‘A simple mistake can attract our attention’: ATO reminder about FBT slips-ups
Australia by numbers – Update
Beware residency rules if moving overseas
Meaningful tax reform in high demand
Working holidaymakers and tax returns
Single Touch Payroll – 1 April 2018 Action
Property investors on notice after ATO spots false claims
ATO issues update on cryptocurrency compliance traps
Australia's vital statistics
Accountants spy elder abuse spike as mortgage stress sets in
Tax office releases fresh guidance on SMSFs
Labor's tax plans could favour the rich, analysis shows
FBT Reminder – Odometer Reading
Our website is really our digital office.
‘Substantiation will be a key focus’: ATO drums in tax time 2018 hit list
Super changes: $1.6 million transfer balance cap and death benefit pensions
Payroll, compliance issues top dodgy practices in Aussie business
Employee travel expense deductions
The Goldilocks effect - Economic and market update 4Q 17
Tax assessments confirmed for undisclosed business income
Super returns on the up despite clients’ hesitation
Australia. All you need to know to be the expert.
Articles archive
Quarter 1 January - March 2018
Quarter 4 October - December 2017
Quarter 3 July - September 2017
Quarter 2 April - June 2017
Quarter 1 January - March 2017
Quarter 4 October - December 2016
Quarter 3 July - September 2016
Quarter 2 April - June 2016
Quarter 1 January - March 2016
Quarter 4 October - December 2015
Quarter 3 July - September 2015
Quarter 2 April - June 2015
Quarter 1 January - March 2015
Quarter 4 October - December 2014
Quarter 3 July - September 2014
Quarter 2 April - June 2014
Quarter 1 January - March 2014
Quarter 4 October - December 2013
Quarter 3 July - September 2013
Quarter 2 April - June 2013
Quarter 1 January - March 2013
Quarter 4 October - December 2012
Quarter 3 July - September 2012
Quarter 2 April - June 2012
Quarter 1 January - March 2012
Quarter 4 October - December 2011
Quarter 3 July - September 2011
Quarter 2 April - June 2011
Quarter 1 January - March 2011
Quarter 4 October - December 2010
Quarter 3 July - September 2010
Quarter 2 April - June 2010
Quarter 1 January - March 2010
Quarter 4 October - December 2009
Quarter 3 July - September 2009
Quarter 2 April - June 2009
Quarter 1 January - March 2009
Quarter 4 October - December 2008
Quarter 3 July - September 2008
Quarter 2 April - June 2008
Quarter 1 January - March 2008
Quarter 4 October - December 2007
Quarter 3 July - September 2007
Quarter 2 April - June 2007
Quarter 1 January - March 2007
Quarter 4 October - December 2006
Quarter 3 July - September 2006
Quarter 2 April - June 2006
Quarter 1 January - March 2006
Quarter 4 October - December 2005
Quarter 3 July - September 2005
Quarter 2 April - June 2005
Quarter 1 January - March 2005
Quarter 4 October - December 2004
Quarter 3 July - September 2004
Quarter 2 April - June 2004
Quarter 1 January - March 2004
Quarter 4 October - December 2003
Quarter 3 July - September 2003
Quarter 2 April - June 2003
Quarter 1 January - March 2003
Quarter 4 October - December 2002
Quarter 3 July - September 2002
Quarter 2 April - June 2002
Quarter 1 January - March 2002
Quarter 4 October - December 2001
Quarter 4 of 2001
Articles
Be Sure to leave a Will
Dismissing casual employees
Restructure to save tax?
Travel between jobs
Governments Pre-Election Promises.
Interest charges by Tax Office
An important new service for our Clients.
Be Sure to leave a Will
An Intestate Estate is even more Risky under new provisions ( Victoria only?)

The Statute Law Amendment (Relationships) Act 2001 will come into effect soon. This Act significantly amends the Administration and Probate Act by altering the order of distribution where a person dies intestate (i.e. without a valid will).  ( We expect this probably applies in Victoria only but will research further)

The amendments address the discriminatory treatment of defacto partners of persons who die intestate. Under the present statutory scheme of distribution that applies where a person dies without a Will, defacto partners do not receive any distribution from their deceased partner?s estate. The estate is instead distributed to the deceased?s spouse, and/or nearest next of kin in accordance with a statutory formula.

However, the amendments will introduce a degree of uncertainty and potential litigation that previously did not exist. The amendments may also in certain circumstances create inequitable outcomes.

A key aspect of the amendments to the statutory scheme of distribution is the replacement of ?spouse? with ?partner?. ?Partner? is defined to include a spouse and a ?domestic partner?.

The act defines ?domestic partner? to be either someone who was living with the deceased at the time of his or her death ??as a couple on a genuine domestic basis?? for a continuous period of two years prior to the deceased?s death; or someone who was living with the deceased at the time of his or her death,??.as a couple on a genuine domestic basis?? irrespective of the time involved, provided they are a ?parent? of the deceased?s child and that child is under the age of 18 years at the time of deceased?s death.

?Parent? is defined to include a domestic partner who has ??day to day care and control of the child and with whom the child is ordinarily resident...?  This definition of a partner would appear to open the door to claims for distribution from short term domestic partners at the expense of the deceased?s children. It is also not clear whether a person still qualifies as a ?domestic partner? if he or she no longer acts as a ?parent? after the partner?s death.

The act also contemplates the co-existence of a spouse and a domestic partner and provides for an apportionment of the share that presently is distributed to the spouse. The act does not, however, contemplate the existence of more than one domestic partner, nor does it provide for an apportionment between two domestic partners.

The uncertainty present in the definition of ?domestic partner? may delay the Grant of Probate and the grant of letters of administration (i.e. Permission to take control of the property of the deceased). The Registrar of Probate may refer such applications to the Court.
This will greatly add to the cost of administering the estate of a person who dies without a Will.

These amendments reinforce the message that everyone should have a current Will in order that their Estate is distributed in accordance with their wishes.  We can help with our skills as financial planners (this is our Protax role).

  


23rd-December-2001