Phone: (03) 9563 4688

Email: office@aubreypaton.com.au

Address: 17D Chester Street, Oakleigh VIC 3166

Latest Accounting News
Hot Issues
Tax Time Checklists- Individual, Company, Trust, Partnership and Super Funds
SMSFs - Our 'hardest' jobs
Tax Office reveals adventurous, dubious claims ahead of tax time
ATO reveals top tax time mistakes, set to contact 1 million taxpayers
Watch out for charges with incoming GST laws.
Super savings gap for women stuck at 30%
‘Wipe the slate clean’: Clients, accountants urged to use new amnesty period
Statistics for all Australians
Touch Payroll (STP)
‘Calm before the storm’: Government proposes 12-month SG amnesty
Government intensifies cash payments crackdown - Kelly O'Dwyer
Passive investment companies tax rate still 30%
Cryptocurrency audits tipped to increase this EOFY
Australia by numbers – Update
$2.4m lost to tax scams, ACCC reports
No GST on digital currency
Federal Budget 2018 - Overview
Your Budget
4 components of our 2018 Federal Budget
Resources to help understand and implement Single Touch Payroll (STP)
New rules capture SMSFs trading big with cryptocurrency
New passive income test for lower corporate tax rate
Tools to help you manage your financial position are available on our site.
‘A simple mistake can attract our attention’: ATO reminder about FBT slips-ups
Australia by numbers – Update
Beware residency rules if moving overseas
Meaningful tax reform in high demand
Working holidaymakers and tax returns
Articles archive
Quarter 2 April - June 2018
Quarter 1 January - March 2018
Quarter 4 October - December 2017
Quarter 3 July - September 2017
Quarter 2 April - June 2017
Quarter 1 January - March 2017
Quarter 4 October - December 2016
Quarter 3 July - September 2016
Quarter 2 April - June 2016
Quarter 1 January - March 2016
Quarter 4 October - December 2015
Quarter 3 July - September 2015
Quarter 2 April - June 2015
Quarter 1 January - March 2015
Quarter 4 October - December 2014
Quarter 3 July - September 2014
Quarter 2 April - June 2014
Quarter 1 January - March 2014
Quarter 4 October - December 2013
Quarter 3 July - September 2013
Quarter 2 April - June 2013
Quarter 1 January - March 2013
Quarter 4 October - December 2012
Quarter 3 July - September 2012
Quarter 2 April - June 2012
Quarter 1 January - March 2012
Quarter 4 October - December 2011
Quarter 3 July - September 2011
Quarter 2 April - June 2011
Quarter 1 January - March 2011
Quarter 4 October - December 2010
Quarter 3 July - September 2010
Quarter 2 April - June 2010
Quarter 1 January - March 2010
Quarter 4 October - December 2009
Quarter 3 July - September 2009
Quarter 2 April - June 2009
Quarter 1 January - March 2009
Quarter 4 October - December 2008
Quarter 3 July - September 2008
Quarter 2 April - June 2008
Quarter 1 January - March 2008
Quarter 4 October - December 2007
Quarter 2 April - June 2007
Quarter 1 January - March 2007
Quarter 2 April - June 2006
Quarter 1 January - March 2006
Quarter 4 October - December 2005
Quarter 3 July - September 2005
Quarter 4 of 2009
Articles

From George and John

Merry Christmas and a Happy new Year to all our clients.
Powerful Superannuation tool on our site.
Gifts Provided to Employees at a Christmas Party – any FBT?
Reminder Tax Break Deadlines
Australian Taxation Office (ATO) Bungled Attack on Foreigners
Tax File Numbers (TFN) and Super Funds
Recognition of same-sex Couples in Super
Attitude of Banks to Insolvency
From the Desks of George and John
3 x Tax Time Checklists
Director Penalties – Workplace Relations Act
Tougher Sponsored Workers Policy
Insolvent Trading Defences
Case Study - Player Management Fee Deductions
Case Study - Player Management Fee Deductions
The courts have been considering the deductibility of management fees paid to professional footballers’ managers for some time.

The management fees were calculated as percentages of gross earnings from both playing and non-playing.  The majority of the players’ income in the relevant years was derived from playing activities.  A deduction was sought for a fee relating entirely to negotiating the players’ playing contract with their football club.

The taxpayer’s non-playing activities (e.g. endorsements and media appearances) could constitute a business, as conceded by the Commissioner.

The Full Court considered that the fee, incurred in negotiation the players’ employment contract was incurred in placing the taxpayers in a position to earn employment assessable income and was therefore incurred too early to be deductible.

----------------------------------

The final say in this long saga has been made in favour of the AFL/NRL players.

The High Court now confirms that management fees paid off by professional footballers are deductible, because they were carrying on a business exploiting their sporting prowess and associated celebrity, and this was inextricably linked to their respective employment by their respective football clubs.

The tax act provides that a business includes any profession, trade employment, vocation or calling, but does not include occupation as an employee.

The High Court has interpreted this definition to mean that something more than mere employment is required for a business, but it does not prevent employment from forming an integral part of an overall business.

The playing contracts for the footballers’ employment with their club were revenue in nature, not capital.

The High Court has confirmed that it is possible to obtain and perform an employment contract as part of and during the course of running a business, meaning that employment contract income may be business income in some cases.

There was a synergy between both activities, such that it would be artificial to separate them, each player conducted his own business in a commercial and business-like way with the engagement of a manager being a particular indication of this commerciality and the fact the player contracts specifically contemplated the footballers concurrently undertaking non-employment promotional activities was relevant, as well as the tripartite nature of the player contracts between the AFL/NRL, together with the attributes of modern professional sportspersons, as noted in the earlier High Court decision of Stone (Olympic javelin thrower).

Many employment contracts will not have the above features, so many may not be able to parallel this favourable result.  This decision is also likely to impact personal services income rules in future.

 

 

 

 

 



1st-October-2009