Phone: (03) 9563 4688

Email: office@aubreypaton.com.au

Address: 17D Chester Street, Oakleigh VIC 3166

Latest Accounting News
Hot Issues
Tax Time Checklists- Individual, Company, Trust, Partnership and Super Funds
SMSFs - Our 'hardest' jobs
Tax Office reveals adventurous, dubious claims ahead of tax time
ATO reveals top tax time mistakes, set to contact 1 million taxpayers
Watch out for charges with incoming GST laws.
Super savings gap for women stuck at 30%
‘Wipe the slate clean’: Clients, accountants urged to use new amnesty period
Statistics for all Australians
Touch Payroll (STP)
‘Calm before the storm’: Government proposes 12-month SG amnesty
Government intensifies cash payments crackdown - Kelly O'Dwyer
Passive investment companies tax rate still 30%
Cryptocurrency audits tipped to increase this EOFY
Australia by numbers – Update
$2.4m lost to tax scams, ACCC reports
No GST on digital currency
Federal Budget 2018 - Overview
Your Budget
4 components of our 2018 Federal Budget
Resources to help understand and implement Single Touch Payroll (STP)
New rules capture SMSFs trading big with cryptocurrency
New passive income test for lower corporate tax rate
Tools to help you manage your financial position are available on our site.
‘A simple mistake can attract our attention’: ATO reminder about FBT slips-ups
Australia by numbers – Update
Beware residency rules if moving overseas
Meaningful tax reform in high demand
Working holidaymakers and tax returns
Single Touch Payroll – 1 April 2018 Action
Articles archive
Quarter 2 April - June 2018
Quarter 1 January - March 2018
Quarter 4 October - December 2017
Quarter 3 July - September 2017
Quarter 2 April - June 2017
Quarter 1 January - March 2017
Quarter 4 October - December 2016
Quarter 3 July - September 2016
Quarter 2 April - June 2016
Quarter 1 January - March 2016
Quarter 4 October - December 2015
Quarter 3 July - September 2015
Quarter 2 April - June 2015
Quarter 1 January - March 2015
Quarter 4 October - December 2014
Quarter 3 July - September 2014
Quarter 2 April - June 2014
Quarter 1 January - March 2014
Quarter 4 October - December 2013
Quarter 3 July - September 2013
Quarter 2 April - June 2013
Quarter 1 January - March 2013
Quarter 4 October - December 2012
Quarter 3 July - September 2012
Quarter 2 April - June 2012
Quarter 1 January - March 2012
Quarter 4 October - December 2011
Quarter 3 July - September 2011
Quarter 2 April - June 2011
Quarter 1 January - March 2011
Quarter 4 October - December 2010
Quarter 3 July - September 2010
Quarter 2 April - June 2010
Quarter 1 January - March 2010
Quarter 4 October - December 2009
Quarter 3 July - September 2009
Quarter 2 April - June 2009
Quarter 1 January - March 2009
Quarter 4 October - December 2008
Quarter 3 July - September 2008
Quarter 2 April - June 2008
Quarter 1 January - March 2008
Quarter 4 October - December 2007
Quarter 2 April - June 2007
Quarter 1 January - March 2007
Quarter 2 April - June 2006
Quarter 1 January - March 2006
Quarter 4 October - December 2005
Quarter 3 July - September 2005
Quarter 1 of 2011
Articles
FBT Reminder - Odometer Reading
Australian Taxation office (ATO) provides SMSF Disaster Relief
Youth Allowance - Australian Taxation Office (ATO) Initiative
February 2011 Newsletter
Commonwealth Education Payments
Flood Victims - Recovery Resources
Tax Lodgements for Flood Affected Taxpayers
Bucket Donations to Flood Relief

January 2011 Newsletter

Personal Property Securities (PPS)
Current Depreciating Asset Issues
Budget Promises Fade Away
Youth Allowance - Australian Taxation Office (ATO) Initiative

The ATO will shortly give eligible taxpayers a deduction of $550 during 2007, 2008, 2009 and 2010.


A previous article has described the court case of Anstis, a student who won her case for expenses necessarily incurred to obtain an Austudy allowance. The original article from 31-7-09 is copied below this new article.  

Whilst the ATO may have been unhappy at losing the case, the precedent at the highest court meant that many taxpayers were ready to lodge objections for previous years.

Instead, the ATO hope that by being proactive, affected taxpayers will be satisfied with the $550 deduction without any verification.

This is an arbitrary figure - if a taxpayer has incurred more, then an objection can still be lodged - subject to time limits.  Hence don't delay.

The ATO will send an explanation to affected clients, but if this letter is returned unclaimed, the deduction will not be allowed.  Any taxpayer using a tax agent will receive the letter direct, but the assessment and refund via the tax agent.

If you are affected and satisfied with the $550 as an average expenditure, then do nothing, but if you spent more than $550 then obtain the evidence straight away.  There are time limits and expect processing delays for later submissions.

-------------------------------------------------

31-7-09

Student entitled to deductions against Youth Allowance

Some commentators have been surprised by a decision to follow the logic of the meaning of "necessarily incurred", which is contrary to Australian Taxation Office (ATO) views.

The Federal Court has held that a student taxpayer who received Youth Allowance was entitled to a deduction for her expenditure in pursuing a teaching degree (on travel to and from teaching rounds, student administration fees, text books, etc), as these outgoings were incurred in the gaining of producing of her assessable income (being the Youth Allowance). 

Under the Social Security Act 1991, a recipient of Youth Allowance is required throughout the relevant period to undertake full-time study, which is satisfied if they:- 

  • are enrolled at an educational institution;
  • undertake at least three quarters of the normal amount of full-time study in respect of the relevant course; and
  • in the Secretary's opinion are making satisfactory progress towards completing the course.

The Court basically held that, since the taxpayer had to spend money to satisfy these requirements and receive the Youth Allowance, the outgoings were incurred in gaining or producing her assessable income.

We have argued this in the past, because we were of similar view as the Full Federal Court, but unable to afford to challenge the ATO.

Expect the ATO to submit that the case was decided on its facts (and therefore not have general application), but this decision could have wider application.

 

 

 



22nd-March-2011