Phone: (03) 9563 4688

Email: office@aubreypaton.com.au

Address: 17D Chester Street, Oakleigh VIC 3166

Latest Accounting News
Hot Issues
$20m boost for SME clients looking to exporting
Work-Related Expenses
ATO updates crypto guidance
ATO zones in on hundreds of newly created reserves
Senate passes $20,000 instant asset write-off extension
Victorian Vacant Property Tax
Director Penalty Notices
ATO set to pounce on undisclosed income streams
In case you missed it – The company tax Bill that did pass Parliament.
GST spotlight headed to smaller end of town
Superannuation Amnesty – Maybe! Maybe Not!
ATO drills in car-sharing focus this tax time
What is Bankruptcy?
Update of Australia's vital statistics
ATO speaks on risk factors, surveillance triggers for FY19
ATO’s corporate residency guidance cops backlash
ATO dispels top tax time myths to clients as clampdown rolls out
Tools for budgeting, cash flow, Super and more ….
Guidance for SMSFs on transfer balance reporting
ATO issues alert on super, tax scams
Salary sacrifice integrity
Understanding the evolution of blockchain and cryptocurrencies
Update to Australia's vital statistics
Tax Time Checklists- Individual, Company, Trust, Partnership and Super Funds
SMSFs - Our 'hardest' jobs
Tax Office reveals adventurous, dubious claims ahead of tax time
ATO reveals top tax time mistakes, set to contact 1 million taxpayers
Watch out for charges with incoming GST laws.
Articles archive
Quarter 3 July - September 2018
Quarter 2 April - June 2018
Quarter 1 January - March 2018
Quarter 4 October - December 2017
Quarter 3 July - September 2017
Quarter 2 April - June 2017
Quarter 1 January - March 2017
Quarter 4 October - December 2016
Quarter 3 July - September 2016
Quarter 2 April - June 2016
Quarter 1 January - March 2016
Quarter 4 October - December 2015
Quarter 3 July - September 2015
Quarter 2 April - June 2015
Quarter 1 January - March 2015
Quarter 4 October - December 2014
Quarter 3 July - September 2014
Quarter 2 April - June 2014
Quarter 1 January - March 2014
Quarter 4 October - December 2013
Quarter 3 July - September 2013
Quarter 2 April - June 2013
Quarter 1 January - March 2013
Quarter 4 October - December 2012
Quarter 3 July - September 2012
Quarter 2 April - June 2012
Quarter 1 January - March 2012
Quarter 4 October - December 2011
Quarter 3 July - September 2011
Quarter 2 April - June 2011
Quarter 1 January - March 2011
Quarter 4 October - December 2010
Quarter 3 July - September 2010
Quarter 2 April - June 2010
Quarter 1 January - March 2010
Quarter 4 October - December 2009
Quarter 3 July - September 2009
Quarter 2 April - June 2009
Quarter 1 January - March 2009
Quarter 4 October - December 2008
Quarter 3 July - September 2008
Quarter 2 April - June 2008
Quarter 1 January - March 2008
Quarter 4 October - December 2007
Quarter 2 April - June 2007
Quarter 1 January - March 2007
Quarter 2 April - June 2006
Quarter 1 January - March 2006
Quarter 4 October - December 2005
Quarter 3 July - September 2005
Quarter 1 of 2011
Articles
FBT Reminder - Odometer Reading
Australian Taxation office (ATO) provides SMSF Disaster Relief
Youth Allowance - Australian Taxation Office (ATO) Initiative
February 2011 Newsletter
Commonwealth Education Payments
Flood Victims - Recovery Resources
Tax Lodgements for Flood Affected Taxpayers
Bucket Donations to Flood Relief

January 2011 Newsletter

Personal Property Securities (PPS)
Current Depreciating Asset Issues
Budget Promises Fade Away
Youth Allowance - Australian Taxation Office (ATO) Initiative

The ATO will shortly give eligible taxpayers a deduction of $550 during 2007, 2008, 2009 and 2010.


A previous article has described the court case of Anstis, a student who won her case for expenses necessarily incurred to obtain an Austudy allowance. The original article from 31-7-09 is copied below this new article.  

Whilst the ATO may have been unhappy at losing the case, the precedent at the highest court meant that many taxpayers were ready to lodge objections for previous years.

Instead, the ATO hope that by being proactive, affected taxpayers will be satisfied with the $550 deduction without any verification.

This is an arbitrary figure - if a taxpayer has incurred more, then an objection can still be lodged - subject to time limits.  Hence don't delay.

The ATO will send an explanation to affected clients, but if this letter is returned unclaimed, the deduction will not be allowed.  Any taxpayer using a tax agent will receive the letter direct, but the assessment and refund via the tax agent.

If you are affected and satisfied with the $550 as an average expenditure, then do nothing, but if you spent more than $550 then obtain the evidence straight away.  There are time limits and expect processing delays for later submissions.

-------------------------------------------------

31-7-09

Student entitled to deductions against Youth Allowance

Some commentators have been surprised by a decision to follow the logic of the meaning of "necessarily incurred", which is contrary to Australian Taxation Office (ATO) views.

The Federal Court has held that a student taxpayer who received Youth Allowance was entitled to a deduction for her expenditure in pursuing a teaching degree (on travel to and from teaching rounds, student administration fees, text books, etc), as these outgoings were incurred in the gaining of producing of her assessable income (being the Youth Allowance). 

Under the Social Security Act 1991, a recipient of Youth Allowance is required throughout the relevant period to undertake full-time study, which is satisfied if they:- 

  • are enrolled at an educational institution;
  • undertake at least three quarters of the normal amount of full-time study in respect of the relevant course; and
  • in the Secretary's opinion are making satisfactory progress towards completing the course.

The Court basically held that, since the taxpayer had to spend money to satisfy these requirements and receive the Youth Allowance, the outgoings were incurred in gaining or producing her assessable income.

We have argued this in the past, because we were of similar view as the Full Federal Court, but unable to afford to challenge the ATO.

Expect the ATO to submit that the case was decided on its facts (and therefore not have general application), but this decision could have wider application.

 

 

 



22nd-March-2011