Phone: (03) 9563 4688

Email: office@aubreypaton.com.au

Address: 17D Chester Street, Oakleigh VIC 3166

Latest Accounting News
Hot Issues
Touch Payroll (STP)
‘Calm before the storm’: Government proposes 12-month SG amnesty
Government intensifies cash payments crackdown - Kelly O'Dwyer
Passive investment companies tax rate still 30%
Cryptocurrency audits tipped to increase this EOFY
Australia by numbers – Update
$2.4m lost to tax scams, ACCC reports
No GST on digital currency
Federal Budget 2018 - Overview
Your Budget
4 components of our 2018 Federal Budget
Resources to help understand and implement Single Touch Payroll (STP)
New rules capture SMSFs trading big with cryptocurrency
New passive income test for lower corporate tax rate
Tools to help you manage your financial position are available on our site.
‘A simple mistake can attract our attention’: ATO reminder about FBT slips-ups
Australia by numbers – Update
Beware residency rules if moving overseas
Meaningful tax reform in high demand
Working holidaymakers and tax returns
Single Touch Payroll – 1 April 2018 Action
Property investors on notice after ATO spots false claims
ATO issues update on cryptocurrency compliance traps
Australia's vital statistics
Accountants spy elder abuse spike as mortgage stress sets in
Tax office releases fresh guidance on SMSFs
Labor's tax plans could favour the rich, analysis shows
FBT Reminder – Odometer Reading
Our website is really our digital office.
‘Substantiation will be a key focus’: ATO drums in tax time 2018 hit list
Super changes: $1.6 million transfer balance cap and death benefit pensions
Articles archive
Quarter 1 January - March 2018
Quarter 4 October - December 2017
Quarter 3 July - September 2017
Quarter 2 April - June 2017
Quarter 1 January - March 2017
Quarter 4 October - December 2016
Quarter 3 July - September 2016
Quarter 2 April - June 2016
Quarter 1 January - March 2016
Quarter 4 October - December 2015
Quarter 3 July - September 2015
Quarter 2 April - June 2015
Quarter 1 January - March 2015
Quarter 4 October - December 2014
Quarter 3 July - September 2014
Quarter 2 April - June 2014
Quarter 1 January - March 2014
Quarter 4 October - December 2013
Quarter 3 July - September 2013
Quarter 2 April - June 2013
Quarter 1 January - March 2013
Quarter 4 October - December 2012
Quarter 3 July - September 2012
Quarter 2 April - June 2012
Quarter 1 January - March 2012
Quarter 4 October - December 2011
Quarter 3 July - September 2011
Quarter 2 April - June 2011
Quarter 1 January - March 2011
Quarter 4 October - December 2010
Quarter 3 July - September 2010
Quarter 2 April - June 2010
Quarter 1 January - March 2010
Quarter 4 October - December 2009
Quarter 3 July - September 2009
Quarter 2 April - June 2009
Quarter 1 January - March 2009
Quarter 4 October - December 2008
Quarter 3 July - September 2008
Quarter 2 April - June 2008
Quarter 1 January - March 2008
Quarter 4 October - December 2007
Quarter 2 April - June 2007
Quarter 1 January - March 2007
Quarter 2 April - June 2006
Quarter 1 January - March 2006
Quarter 4 October - December 2005
Quarter 3 July - September 2005
Quarter 3 of 2013
Articles
Liberal Party policies and discussion papers
Some terms defined
Flood Insurance - no changes
Pensioners Tax Returns 2013?
Donations - 2013
ATO - Tougher Conditions and Personal Liability
SMSFs: Where the ATO is Looking
A matter of knowledge
Tax Time Checklist 2013 - Individual
Tax Time Checklist 2013 - Company, Trust or Partnership
Tax Time Checklist 2013 - Superannuation Fund
Year End Reminders
Individual Income Tax Changes
Superannuation Guarantee Changes
Obscure disadvantage of family trusts.
Self-managed Superannuation Funds - New Obligations
Obscure disadvantage of family trusts.

 

Normally it would be expected that there are only advantages to occur from being part of a family discretionary trust, but not always so.


     

 

 

 

 

 

In a recent case decided in the Federal Court, the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) successfully ran an argument over an apparently irrelevant procedural issue to win a bigger argument.

The ATO was seeking to amend a taxpayers return and wished to do so more than two years after the relevant year.  It argued that if the taxpayer was a beneficiary of a trust, that the time limit was not two years, but four years.  Then it would be within time to issue the amended assessments for adjustments unrelated to the interest in the family trust.

The taxpayer argued that if that interpretation was correct, then all 126 beneficiary of this trust would also be subject to the same four year rule, rather than the expected two year rule.  The taxpayer had not received a distribution in the year.

The tribunal and then the court above it, agreed with the Commissioner and so the four year opportunity for amended assessments to issue to any potential beneficiary of a family trust will now apply.  This is regardless of whether that beneficiary has received any distribution from the trust.

This particular family trust did not qualify as a small business entity. It therefore did not meet the two year amendment criteria, which meant that the beneficiaries of the trust were subject to the four year amendment rule.

Somewhere in Australia there will be a family trust that does not qualify as a small business entity.  If that trust has a clause that says any resident of Australia is an eligible beneficiary...... Does that seem to be an unintended consequence?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



3rd-July-2013