Phone: (03) 9563 4688

Email: office@aubreypaton.com.au

Address: 17D Chester Street, Oakleigh VIC 3166

Latest Accounting News
Hot Issues
Federal Budget 2019 - Overview
How the 2019 Federal Budget affects you
FBT Reminder – Odometer Reading
‘Big awareness push’ underway as STP deadline approaches
GST collection on overseas goods at 300% of forecasts
The problem with getting to 53 years of age.
Lost Beneficiaries
New quarterly STP reporting method for closely held payees revealed
Some Australian figures to help on Budget night.
Employers hit with rolling SG audits as ATO toughens stance
Resources to help understand and implement Single Touch Payroll (STP)
Big fines, prison on the cards as new SG penalties introduced
Extra website resources and tools is one way we offer you and your family more.
FBT Exemption for Various Work Vehicles
Tax payable on expenditure recoupments
ATO identifies SMSF contravention red flags
Who wins dispute about taxable income?
Australia - facts & figures March 2019
Strategies to handle scam phone calls and problem e-mails.
Instant asset write-off threshold upped to $25k
Jail time for GST fraud
Correcting GST Errors
Fuel tax credit rates raised
ATO set to contact clients for overdue TPAR
Reminder on Victoria Property Duties
How Australia is performing.
Global outlook summary: Down but not out
Bookkeepers remind on incoming TPRS obligations
Golden Rules for Deductions
How's Australia going - vital statistics?
Articles archive
Quarter 1 January - March 2019
Quarter 4 October - December 2018
Quarter 3 July - September 2018
Quarter 2 April - June 2018
Quarter 1 January - March 2018
Quarter 4 October - December 2017
Quarter 3 July - September 2017
Quarter 2 April - June 2017
Quarter 1 January - March 2017
Quarter 4 October - December 2016
Quarter 3 July - September 2016
Quarter 2 April - June 2016
Quarter 1 January - March 2016
Quarter 4 October - December 2015
Quarter 3 July - September 2015
Quarter 2 April - June 2015
Quarter 1 January - March 2015
Quarter 4 October - December 2014
Quarter 3 July - September 2014
Quarter 2 April - June 2014
Quarter 1 January - March 2014
Quarter 4 October - December 2013
Quarter 3 July - September 2013
Quarter 2 April - June 2013
Quarter 1 January - March 2013
Quarter 4 October - December 2012
Quarter 3 July - September 2012
Quarter 2 April - June 2012
Quarter 1 January - March 2012
Quarter 4 October - December 2011
Quarter 3 July - September 2011
Quarter 2 April - June 2011
Quarter 1 January - March 2011
Quarter 4 October - December 2010
Quarter 3 July - September 2010
Quarter 2 April - June 2010
Quarter 1 January - March 2010
Quarter 4 October - December 2009
Quarter 3 July - September 2009
Quarter 2 April - June 2009
Quarter 1 January - March 2009
Quarter 4 October - December 2008
Quarter 3 July - September 2008
Quarter 2 April - June 2008
Quarter 1 January - March 2008
Quarter 4 October - December 2007
Quarter 2 April - June 2007
Quarter 1 January - March 2007
Quarter 2 April - June 2006
Quarter 1 January - March 2006
Quarter 4 October - December 2005
Quarter 3 July - September 2005
Quarter 3 of 2013
Articles
Liberal Party policies and discussion papers
Some terms defined
Flood Insurance - no changes
Pensioners Tax Returns 2013?
Donations - 2013
ATO - Tougher Conditions and Personal Liability
SMSFs: Where the ATO is Looking
A matter of knowledge
Tax Time Checklist 2013 - Individual
Tax Time Checklist 2013 - Company, Trust or Partnership
Tax Time Checklist 2013 - Superannuation Fund
Year End Reminders
Individual Income Tax Changes
Superannuation Guarantee Changes
Obscure disadvantage of family trusts.
Self-managed Superannuation Funds - New Obligations
Obscure disadvantage of family trusts.

 

Normally it would be expected that there are only advantages to occur from being part of a family discretionary trust, but not always so.


     

 

 

 

 

 

In a recent case decided in the Federal Court, the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) successfully ran an argument over an apparently irrelevant procedural issue to win a bigger argument.

The ATO was seeking to amend a taxpayers return and wished to do so more than two years after the relevant year.  It argued that if the taxpayer was a beneficiary of a trust, that the time limit was not two years, but four years.  Then it would be within time to issue the amended assessments for adjustments unrelated to the interest in the family trust.

The taxpayer argued that if that interpretation was correct, then all 126 beneficiary of this trust would also be subject to the same four year rule, rather than the expected two year rule.  The taxpayer had not received a distribution in the year.

The tribunal and then the court above it, agreed with the Commissioner and so the four year opportunity for amended assessments to issue to any potential beneficiary of a family trust will now apply.  This is regardless of whether that beneficiary has received any distribution from the trust.

This particular family trust did not qualify as a small business entity. It therefore did not meet the two year amendment criteria, which meant that the beneficiaries of the trust were subject to the four year amendment rule.

Somewhere in Australia there will be a family trust that does not qualify as a small business entity.  If that trust has a clause that says any resident of Australia is an eligible beneficiary...... Does that seem to be an unintended consequence?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



3rd-July-2013