Phone: (03) 9563 4688

Email: office@aubreypaton.com.au

Address: 17D Chester Street, Oakleigh VIC 3166

Latest Accounting News
Hot Issues
In case you missed it – The company tax Bill that did pass Parliament.
GST spotlight headed to smaller end of town
Superannuation Amnesty – Maybe! Maybe Not!
ATO drills in car-sharing focus this tax time
What is Bankruptcy?
Update of Australia's vital statistics
ATO speaks on risk factors, surveillance triggers for FY19
ATO’s corporate residency guidance cops backlash
ATO dispels top tax time myths to clients as clampdown rolls out
Tools for budgeting, cash flow, Super and more ….
Guidance for SMSFs on transfer balance reporting
ATO issues alert on super, tax scams
Salary sacrifice integrity
Understanding the evolution of blockchain and cryptocurrencies
Update to Australia's vital statistics
Tax Time Checklists- Individual, Company, Trust, Partnership and Super Funds
SMSFs - Our 'hardest' jobs
Tax Office reveals adventurous, dubious claims ahead of tax time
ATO reveals top tax time mistakes, set to contact 1 million taxpayers
Watch out for charges with incoming GST laws.
Super savings gap for women stuck at 30%
‘Wipe the slate clean’: Clients, accountants urged to use new amnesty period
Statistics for all Australians
Touch Payroll (STP)
‘Calm before the storm’: Government proposes 12-month SG amnesty
Government intensifies cash payments crackdown - Kelly O'Dwyer
Articles archive
Quarter 2 April - June 2018
Quarter 1 January - March 2018
Quarter 4 October - December 2017
Quarter 3 July - September 2017
Quarter 2 April - June 2017
Quarter 1 January - March 2017
Quarter 4 October - December 2016
Quarter 3 July - September 2016
Quarter 2 April - June 2016
Quarter 1 January - March 2016
Quarter 4 October - December 2015
Quarter 3 July - September 2015
Quarter 2 April - June 2015
Quarter 1 January - March 2015
Quarter 4 October - December 2014
Quarter 3 July - September 2014
Quarter 2 April - June 2014
Quarter 1 January - March 2014
Quarter 4 October - December 2013
Quarter 3 July - September 2013
Quarter 2 April - June 2013
Quarter 1 January - March 2013
Quarter 4 October - December 2012
Quarter 3 July - September 2012
Quarter 2 April - June 2012
Quarter 1 January - March 2012
Quarter 4 October - December 2011
Quarter 3 July - September 2011
Quarter 2 April - June 2011
Quarter 1 January - March 2011
Quarter 4 October - December 2010
Quarter 3 July - September 2010
Quarter 2 April - June 2010
Quarter 1 January - March 2010
Quarter 4 October - December 2009
Quarter 3 July - September 2009
Quarter 2 April - June 2009
Quarter 1 January - March 2009
Quarter 4 October - December 2008
Quarter 3 July - September 2008
Quarter 2 April - June 2008
Quarter 1 January - March 2008
Quarter 4 October - December 2007
Quarter 2 April - June 2007
Quarter 1 January - March 2007
Quarter 2 April - June 2006
Quarter 1 January - March 2006
Quarter 4 October - December 2005
Quarter 3 July - September 2005
Quarter 3 of 2013
Articles
Liberal Party policies and discussion papers
Some terms defined
Flood Insurance - no changes
Pensioners Tax Returns 2013?
Donations - 2013
ATO - Tougher Conditions and Personal Liability
SMSFs: Where the ATO is Looking
A matter of knowledge
Tax Time Checklist 2013 - Individual
Tax Time Checklist 2013 - Company, Trust or Partnership
Tax Time Checklist 2013 - Superannuation Fund
Year End Reminders
Individual Income Tax Changes
Superannuation Guarantee Changes
Obscure disadvantage of family trusts.
Self-managed Superannuation Funds - New Obligations
Obscure disadvantage of family trusts.

 

Normally it would be expected that there are only advantages to occur from being part of a family discretionary trust, but not always so.


     

 

 

 

 

 

In a recent case decided in the Federal Court, the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) successfully ran an argument over an apparently irrelevant procedural issue to win a bigger argument.

The ATO was seeking to amend a taxpayers return and wished to do so more than two years after the relevant year.  It argued that if the taxpayer was a beneficiary of a trust, that the time limit was not two years, but four years.  Then it would be within time to issue the amended assessments for adjustments unrelated to the interest in the family trust.

The taxpayer argued that if that interpretation was correct, then all 126 beneficiary of this trust would also be subject to the same four year rule, rather than the expected two year rule.  The taxpayer had not received a distribution in the year.

The tribunal and then the court above it, agreed with the Commissioner and so the four year opportunity for amended assessments to issue to any potential beneficiary of a family trust will now apply.  This is regardless of whether that beneficiary has received any distribution from the trust.

This particular family trust did not qualify as a small business entity. It therefore did not meet the two year amendment criteria, which meant that the beneficiaries of the trust were subject to the four year amendment rule.

Somewhere in Australia there will be a family trust that does not qualify as a small business entity.  If that trust has a clause that says any resident of Australia is an eligible beneficiary...... Does that seem to be an unintended consequence?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



3rd-July-2013