Phone: (03) 9563 4688

Email: office@aubreypaton.com.au

Address: 17D Chester Street, Oakleigh VIC 3166

Latest Accounting News
Hot Issues
Tax Office sounds alarm on popular property strategy
Our Advent calendar for 2018
‘Please do not panic’: ATO boss addresses STP concerns
Stop!! Don't do a paper Budget, use our online budgeting tools instead.
Employee Christmas Parties and Gifts – Any FBT?
Behavioural Coaching and your financial plans
FBT – Christmas Parties and Taxi Fares
Information needed to be the BBQ expert.
Tax consequences of trust vesting
Fringe Benefits Tax (FBT): employees’ private use of vehicles
ATO to contact clients over bank details
ATO claws back $850m in unpaid SG in FY 17-18
Appetite for property in SMSFs shows signs of life despite tough market
Superannuation gender gap narrowing, research shows
Identification numbers for directors
How financial advice helps create wealth.
Australia's vital statistics
Unlocking equity crowdfunding in Australia
$20m boost for SME clients looking to exporting
Work-Related Expenses
ATO updates crypto guidance
ATO zones in on hundreds of newly created reserves
Senate passes $20,000 instant asset write-off extension
Victorian Vacant Property Tax
Director Penalty Notices
ATO set to pounce on undisclosed income streams
In case you missed it – The company tax Bill that did pass Parliament.
GST spotlight headed to smaller end of town
Superannuation Amnesty – Maybe! Maybe Not!
Articles archive
Quarter 3 July - September 2018
Quarter 2 April - June 2018
Quarter 1 January - March 2018
Quarter 4 October - December 2017
Quarter 3 July - September 2017
Quarter 2 April - June 2017
Quarter 1 January - March 2017
Quarter 4 October - December 2016
Quarter 3 July - September 2016
Quarter 2 April - June 2016
Quarter 1 January - March 2016
Quarter 4 October - December 2015
Quarter 3 July - September 2015
Quarter 2 April - June 2015
Quarter 1 January - March 2015
Quarter 4 October - December 2014
Quarter 3 July - September 2014
Quarter 2 April - June 2014
Quarter 1 January - March 2014
Quarter 4 October - December 2013
Quarter 3 July - September 2013
Quarter 2 April - June 2013
Quarter 1 January - March 2013
Quarter 4 October - December 2012
Quarter 3 July - September 2012
Quarter 2 April - June 2012
Quarter 1 January - March 2012
Quarter 4 October - December 2011
Quarter 3 July - September 2011
Quarter 2 April - June 2011
Quarter 1 January - March 2011
Quarter 4 October - December 2010
Quarter 3 July - September 2010
Quarter 2 April - June 2010
Quarter 1 January - March 2010
Quarter 4 October - December 2009
Quarter 3 July - September 2009
Quarter 2 April - June 2009
Quarter 1 January - March 2009
Quarter 4 October - December 2008
Quarter 3 July - September 2008
Quarter 2 April - June 2008
Quarter 1 January - March 2008
Quarter 4 October - December 2007
Quarter 2 April - June 2007
Quarter 1 January - March 2007
Quarter 2 April - June 2006
Quarter 1 January - March 2006
Quarter 4 October - December 2005
Quarter 3 July - September 2005
Quarter 2 of 2014
Articles
Help investor's to save $82 per week
Postage Stamp Increase
eBay Fees
Federal Budget 2014-15 - Overview
Federal Budget 2014-15 - Overview of main responsibilities
Federal Budget Papers 2014-15
Deadlines for Superannuation Contributions
Three property depreciation tips
Case for corporate trustee strengthens
Superannuation Death Benefits
Credit Card Users - Do you have monthly fees?
Credit Rating
Credit Card Tips
Case for corporate trustee strengthens

 

The new ATO penalty powers have strengthened the argument for the use of corporate trustees as opposed to individual trustees in SMSFs.


 


Under the ATO’s new regime, penalties are imposed on the SMSF trustee, meaning each individual trustee will be liable for the penalty in most circumstances, SMSF Professionals’ Association of Australia senior manager, technical and policy Jordan George told SMSF Adviser.



 

     


If you have a corporate trustee for an SMSF, however, it will only be the corporate trustee that receives the penalty and the fine, Mr George said.


“I do think there is a possibility, if you did have a situation where a fund had a couple of individual trustees that each received a $10,000 fine, that we may see this as an incentive for people to have a corporate trustee – and for advisers to recommend the corporate trustee as the appropriate trustee for an SMSF,” he stated.


“It is just another reason, on top of the many already good reasons, to have a corporate trustee – the penalty provisions do apply better if you have a corporate trustee rather than individual trustees,” he added.


Heffron’s head of customer Meg Heffron similarly said corporate trustees are generally the “way to go”.


“It is a far more resilient structure; if you have individual trustees and someone dies or someone leaves or someone new joins, you have got to go and change all the names on the assets, and people never do it right and they end up with an ongoing breach for years and years,” she told SMSF Adviser.


The SMSF Academy’s managing director Aaron Dunn told SMSF Adviser the individual versus corporate trustee debate will be “fascinating” in regards to the new ATO penalty powers.


“When you are looking at penalties potentially at $10,200 per individual trustee when they could have capped it at $10,200 with a corporate trustee… you could be looking at the difference between $40,400 and $10,200,” he said.


“Given that approximately nine in every 10 SMSFs are being set up with an individual trustee, this will now be exposing each individual to all of the risks. You will get a whole range of combinations that could be exposing relatives, family members, friends, professionals to these unintended outcomes,” he added


 


Written by Elyse Perrau
Tuesday, 22 April 2014
www.smsfadviseronline.com.au




13th-May-2014