Phone: (03) 9563 4688

Email: office@aubreypaton.com.au

Address: 17D Chester Street, Oakleigh VIC 3166

Latest Accounting News
Hot Issues
300,000 SMEs utilising $20K write-off, says ATO
‘A bad thing times 10’: ATO set for new SMSF blitz
Capital Gains and Renounceable Rights
Paperwork bungles lead to $38k in payments
Australian Dietary Guidelines and healthy eating chart (PDF)
Former director liable for company’s unpaid tax liabilities
Resources on our site to help you, your family and your friends.
Super for housing measures enter Senate
No Special Circumstances to allow Excess Super Contributions
Housing tax measures progress to Parliament
AirBnb – wrong tax outcome?
Are young investors wasting their youth?
ATO sending 'more letters than ever' on income tax errors
Powerful Budgeting, cash flow and Super Tools available on our site.
Property, unit trusts in ATO's sights
Australian Dietary Guidelines and healthy eating chart (PDF)
Major Bank Levy Passed
NSW tops list as ATO reveals billions in lost super
Australia's leading causes of death - ABS
How is your super going, ready for retirement?
ATO increasing data exchange with international regulators
Illegal SMSF early access scheme leads to $6,000 fine
Our 'hardest' SMSF tasks
Uber drivers hit for 10% tax
Lack of literacy promotes unrealistic goals
Taxpayer failed to prove that payments were “loans”
New STP dates confirmed as ATO goes on compliance blitz
ATO flags compliance project for FY17/18
Items that heat up your depreciation deductions
Articles archive
Quarter 3 July - September 2017
Quarter 2 April - June 2017
Quarter 1 January - March 2017
Quarter 4 October - December 2016
Quarter 3 July - September 2016
Quarter 2 April - June 2016
Quarter 1 January - March 2016
Quarter 4 October - December 2015
Quarter 3 July - September 2015
Quarter 2 April - June 2015
Quarter 1 January - March 2015
Quarter 4 October - December 2014
Quarter 3 July - September 2014
Quarter 2 April - June 2014
Quarter 1 January - March 2014
Quarter 4 October - December 2013
Quarter 3 July - September 2013
Quarter 2 April - June 2013
Quarter 1 January - March 2013
Quarter 4 October - December 2012
Quarter 3 July - September 2012
Quarter 2 April - June 2012
Quarter 1 January - March 2012
Quarter 4 October - December 2011
Quarter 3 July - September 2011
Quarter 2 April - June 2011
Quarter 1 January - March 2011
Quarter 4 October - December 2010
Quarter 3 July - September 2010
Quarter 2 April - June 2010
Quarter 1 January - March 2010
Quarter 4 October - December 2009
Quarter 3 July - September 2009
Quarter 2 April - June 2009
Quarter 1 January - March 2009
Quarter 4 October - December 2008
Quarter 3 July - September 2008
Quarter 2 April - June 2008
Quarter 1 January - March 2008
Quarter 4 October - December 2007
Quarter 2 April - June 2007
Quarter 1 January - March 2007
Quarter 2 April - June 2006
Quarter 1 January - March 2006
Quarter 4 October - December 2005
Quarter 3 July - September 2005
Quarter 2 of 2014
Articles
Help investor's to save $82 per week
Postage Stamp Increase
eBay Fees
Federal Budget 2014-15 - Overview
Federal Budget 2014-15 - Overview of main responsibilities
Federal Budget Papers 2014-15
Deadlines for Superannuation Contributions
Three property depreciation tips
Case for corporate trustee strengthens
Superannuation Death Benefits
Credit Card Users - Do you have monthly fees?
Credit Rating
Credit Card Tips
Case for corporate trustee strengthens

 

The new ATO penalty powers have strengthened the argument for the use of corporate trustees as opposed to individual trustees in SMSFs.


 


Under the ATO’s new regime, penalties are imposed on the SMSF trustee, meaning each individual trustee will be liable for the penalty in most circumstances, SMSF Professionals’ Association of Australia senior manager, technical and policy Jordan George told SMSF Adviser.



 

     


If you have a corporate trustee for an SMSF, however, it will only be the corporate trustee that receives the penalty and the fine, Mr George said.


“I do think there is a possibility, if you did have a situation where a fund had a couple of individual trustees that each received a $10,000 fine, that we may see this as an incentive for people to have a corporate trustee – and for advisers to recommend the corporate trustee as the appropriate trustee for an SMSF,” he stated.


“It is just another reason, on top of the many already good reasons, to have a corporate trustee – the penalty provisions do apply better if you have a corporate trustee rather than individual trustees,” he added.


Heffron’s head of customer Meg Heffron similarly said corporate trustees are generally the “way to go”.


“It is a far more resilient structure; if you have individual trustees and someone dies or someone leaves or someone new joins, you have got to go and change all the names on the assets, and people never do it right and they end up with an ongoing breach for years and years,” she told SMSF Adviser.


The SMSF Academy’s managing director Aaron Dunn told SMSF Adviser the individual versus corporate trustee debate will be “fascinating” in regards to the new ATO penalty powers.


“When you are looking at penalties potentially at $10,200 per individual trustee when they could have capped it at $10,200 with a corporate trustee… you could be looking at the difference between $40,400 and $10,200,” he said.


“Given that approximately nine in every 10 SMSFs are being set up with an individual trustee, this will now be exposing each individual to all of the risks. You will get a whole range of combinations that could be exposing relatives, family members, friends, professionals to these unintended outcomes,” he added


 


Written by Elyse Perrau
Tuesday, 22 April 2014
www.smsfadviseronline.com.au




13th-May-2014