Phone: (03) 9563 4688

Email: office@aubreypaton.com.au

Address: 17D Chester Street, Oakleigh VIC 3166

Latest Accounting News
Hot Issues
COVID-19 resources - Jobkeeper, Victoria Stage 4 Update
JobKeeper Phase 2 - Latest Update
Payroll Tax 2020 concessions and JobKeeper
High alert issued over myGov tax time scam
Extended director penalty regime to catch out ‘zombie companies’
SG amnesty deadline - 7 September
‘Hundreds’ to be contacted in ATO early super compliance blitz
90,000 SMEs to benefit from new JobTrainer program
Work Related expenses – 2020
‘Everyone is now on notice’: ATO acquires COVID-19 data on 3m Aussies
Extra Tools & Resources for our clients.
Year End Tax Deductions – “equipment”
Home Office Claims 2020
Early release of super sees ‘high take-up’
Tax time 2020: ATO homes in on rental deduction claims
ATO announces Div 7A COVID-19 assistance
‘HomeBuilder’ grants now available.
$150k instant asset write-off extended for 6 months
JobKeeper documentation ‘absolutely critical’ in ATO audit
Tax Time Checklists - Individuals; Company; Trust; Partnership; and Super Funds
ATO updates JobKeeper compliance approach
COVID-19 hotspots - tax time 2020
Tax reform to feature heavily in PM’s JobMaker plan
Jobkeeper Fraud warning
ATO extends initial JobKeeper payment deadline
Boosting cash flow - ATO
Our website, your resources
ATO releases JobKeeper alternative test
Temporary Working from Home Expenses Rule
Articles archive
Quarter 2 April - June 2020
Quarter 1 January - March 2020
Quarter 4 October - December 2019
Quarter 3 July - September 2019
Quarter 2 April - June 2019
Quarter 1 January - March 2019
Quarter 4 October - December 2018
Quarter 3 July - September 2018
Quarter 2 April - June 2018
Quarter 1 January - March 2018
Quarter 4 October - December 2017
Quarter 3 July - September 2017
Quarter 2 April - June 2017
Quarter 1 January - March 2017
Quarter 4 October - December 2016
Quarter 3 July - September 2016
Quarter 2 April - June 2016
Quarter 1 January - March 2016
Quarter 4 October - December 2015
Quarter 3 July - September 2015
Quarter 2 April - June 2015
Quarter 1 January - March 2015
Quarter 4 October - December 2014
Quarter 3 July - September 2014
Quarter 2 April - June 2014
Quarter 1 January - March 2014
Quarter 4 October - December 2013
Quarter 3 July - September 2013
Quarter 2 April - June 2013
Quarter 1 January - March 2013
Quarter 4 October - December 2012
Quarter 3 July - September 2012
Quarter 2 April - June 2012
Quarter 1 January - March 2012
Quarter 4 October - December 2011
Quarter 3 July - September 2011
Quarter 2 April - June 2011
Quarter 1 January - March 2011
Quarter 4 October - December 2010
Quarter 3 July - September 2010
Quarter 2 April - June 2010
Quarter 1 January - March 2010
Quarter 4 October - December 2009
Quarter 3 July - September 2009
Quarter 2 April - June 2009
Quarter 1 January - March 2009
Quarter 4 October - December 2008
Quarter 3 July - September 2008
Quarter 2 April - June 2008
Quarter 1 January - March 2008
Quarter 4 October - December 2007
Quarter 2 April - June 2007
Quarter 1 January - March 2007
Quarter 2 April - June 2006
Quarter 1 January - March 2006
Quarter 4 October - December 2005
Quarter 3 July - September 2005
Quarter 3 of 2014
Articles
Taxing times for self-managed super funds
Definition of dependant 'evolving'
What are Reportable Employer Superannuation Contributions?
Self-managed Super Funds
Recent court case has 'implications' for SMSFs
3 tax time checklists
Extra Tax on Superannuation Contribution - Last Year
New penalty regime prompts ATO review
Recent court case has 'implications' for SMSFs

 

The outcome of a recent court case offers a “timely reminder” to SMSFs that own units in related trusts, according to AMP SMSF’s Peter Burgess.


Speaking to SMSF Adviser, Mr Burgess noted the Pope v FC of T case involved a family trust that owed some distributions to a taxpayer, but the trust was unable to pay the distributions.



       


 


The taxpayer wrote off the amount that was owed, Mr Burgess said, and then tried to claim the amount written off as a tax deduction.


The deduction was denied because the tax department said it was a loan rather than an unpaid present entitlement.


“This was not an SMSF case … but I think it’s a timely reminder to SMSFs that own units in related trusts. They need to ensure the SMSF is receiving distributions owed to the SMSF in a timely manner,” Mr Burgess said.


The definition of "loan" in the SIS Act is “very broad” and includes any form of financial accommodation.


“So it’s open to the ATO commissioner, where there are unpaid distribution for an extended period of time, to call that a loan,” Mr Burgess said.


This has implications for SMSFs that may invest in related trusts which comply with regulation 13.22C, with one of the requirements of those trusts being they cannot have any borrowings, he said.


“So this would result in those units being classified as the in-house assets of the SMSF, which can lead to breach situations and a $10,200 admin penalty under the new penalty regime,” Mr Burgess said.


“The other issue here is once the related trust has breached the requirement of SIS regulation 13.22C, it can never be a 13.22C trust again, meaning the trust would need to be unwound,” he added.


Written by Katarina Taurian
Monday, 11 August 2014
smsfadviseronline.com.au




21st-August-2014